MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.013

Медицинская библиотека · Behavior therapy · 2016

An Experimental Investigation of Co-rumination, Problem Solving, and Distraction.

Zelic Kate J, Ciesla Jeffrey A, Dickson Kelsey S, Hruska Laura C, Ciesla Shannon N

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Co-rumination involves excessive dwelling on negative aspects of problems within a dyadic relationship (Rose, 2002). While research has focused on the tendency to co-ruminate within particular relationships, we were interested in examining the behavior of co-rumination outside the context of a preexisting relationship. Using an experimental manipulation of co-rumination, the primary goal of this study was to experimentally test the effects of co-rumination and examine its associations with negative and positive affectivity. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three interviewing style conditions: a co-ruminative style, a problem-solving style, or a distracting style. Results revealed that the co-rumination condition significantly differed from both the distraction and problem-solving conditions on overall negative affect, sadness, and anxiety, but not on hostility. There were no significant differences among groups on positive affect. In conclusion, this investigation revealed detrimental effects of co-ruminative behavior even between strangers.

Для цитирования: Zelic Kate J, Ciesla Jeffrey A, Dickson Kelsey S, Hruska Laura C, Ciesla Shannon N. An Experimental Investigation of Co-rumination, Problem Solving, and Distraction.. Behavior therapy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.