The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2006
Attitudes about intimate partner violence screening among an ethnically diverse sample of young women.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zeitler Michelle S, Paine Abigail D, Breitbart Vicki, Rickert Vaughn I, Olson Carolyn, Stevens Lynne, Rottenberg Leslie, Davidson Leslie L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This clinic-based study investigated attitudes about intimate partner violence (IPV) screening among an ethnically diverse population of adolescent and young adult women (n = 645).
METHODS: A cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative survey assessed experiences with and attitudes toward IPV screening.
RESULTS: Almost all participants supported universal IPV screening and over 90% believed that a health care provider was the most appropriate adult to ask them about interpersonal violence. Young women's concerns toward screening varied by age and violence experience; those most likely to mind being screened were younger, had a history of childhood sexual abuse, and were victims of physical violence in the last year. However, even in these groups, over 70% supported IPV screening. Qualitative analyses suggested that provider qualities and confidentiality will affect the amount of disclosure to provider-initiated screening. Women also raised important questions about how to define IPV in relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Young women generally favor universal screening of interpersonal violence, but provider qualities and confidentiality issues affect responses to screening questions.
METHODS: A cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative survey assessed experiences with and attitudes toward IPV screening.
RESULTS: Almost all participants supported universal IPV screening and over 90% believed that a health care provider was the most appropriate adult to ask them about interpersonal violence. Young women's concerns toward screening varied by age and violence experience; those most likely to mind being screened were younger, had a history of childhood sexual abuse, and were victims of physical violence in the last year. However, even in these groups, over 70% supported IPV screening. Qualitative analyses suggested that provider qualities and confidentiality will affect the amount of disclosure to provider-initiated screening. Women also raised important questions about how to define IPV in relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Young women generally favor universal screening of interpersonal violence, but provider qualities and confidentiality issues affect responses to screening questions.