Journal of perioperative practice · 2026
Redesigning the general surgery gold patient protocol in a tertiary centre.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ahmed Sheheryaar, Johnston Annabelle, Peysner Ryan, Ardeshana Arjun, Brocken Megan, Mann Kulbir
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Emergency theatre capacity is under increasing strain due to rising demand and workforce pressures, contributing to delays and poor compliance with national targets. By prioritising patient selection for low-complexity cases/day-case discharge, we implemented a novel Golden Patient Protocol in a multi-specialty tertiary centre and assessed the impact on surgical wait times and overall theatre flow.
METHOD: The golden patient was agreed upon between surgical/anaesthetic registrars, taking into consideration the urgency/fitness of patient and anaesthetic/technical difficulties. Eligible patients were identified early and scheduled for a huddle and sent for by 08:30. Data were collected over four cycles: 1 month before and after the Golden Patient Protocol introduction, following a 4-month 'cooling-off' (post-Golden Patient Protocol) period and at 24 months, using the trust theatre management system (TMIS). For each patient we obtained 'send time', 'time-in-anaesthetic-room', and 'start-time' aka knife-to-skin.
RESULTS: Across 86 patients (pre-Golden Patient Protocol n = 16; Golden Patient Protocol n = 24; post-Golden Patient Protocol n = 20; 24 months n = 26), median 'time-sent' improved from 08:54 pre-Golden Patient Protocol to 08:28 post-Golden Patient Protocol and remained improved at 08:41 at 24 months (p = 0.013). Median 'time in anaesthetic room' improved from 09:10 to 08:47 and was sustained at 08:58 at 24 months (p = 0.046). Significant pairwise differences persisted between pre-Golden Patient Protocol and both post-Golden Patient Protocol and 24-month cohorts. 'Knife-to-skin' showed a trend towards improvement (09:39 to 09:24; p = 0.244).
CONCLUSION: The Golden Patient Protocol significantly improved early emergency theatre flow for lower-complexity cases while supporting registrar autonomy and reducing delays to first send. Although knife-to-skin improvements were modest, earlier patient preparation and anaesthetic room arrival demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful gains that were sustained at 24-month follow-up. This low-cost, scalable intervention aligns with Getting It Right First Time priorities and represents a pragmatic strategy to improve emergency theatre efficiency and workflow sustainability.
METHOD: The golden patient was agreed upon between surgical/anaesthetic registrars, taking into consideration the urgency/fitness of patient and anaesthetic/technical difficulties. Eligible patients were identified early and scheduled for a huddle and sent for by 08:30. Data were collected over four cycles: 1 month before and after the Golden Patient Protocol introduction, following a 4-month 'cooling-off' (post-Golden Patient Protocol) period and at 24 months, using the trust theatre management system (TMIS). For each patient we obtained 'send time', 'time-in-anaesthetic-room', and 'start-time' aka knife-to-skin.
RESULTS: Across 86 patients (pre-Golden Patient Protocol n = 16; Golden Patient Protocol n = 24; post-Golden Patient Protocol n = 20; 24 months n = 26), median 'time-sent' improved from 08:54 pre-Golden Patient Protocol to 08:28 post-Golden Patient Protocol and remained improved at 08:41 at 24 months (p = 0.013). Median 'time in anaesthetic room' improved from 09:10 to 08:47 and was sustained at 08:58 at 24 months (p = 0.046). Significant pairwise differences persisted between pre-Golden Patient Protocol and both post-Golden Patient Protocol and 24-month cohorts. 'Knife-to-skin' showed a trend towards improvement (09:39 to 09:24; p = 0.244).
CONCLUSION: The Golden Patient Protocol significantly improved early emergency theatre flow for lower-complexity cases while supporting registrar autonomy and reducing delays to first send. Although knife-to-skin improvements were modest, earlier patient preparation and anaesthetic room arrival demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful gains that were sustained at 24-month follow-up. This low-cost, scalable intervention aligns with Getting It Right First Time priorities and represents a pragmatic strategy to improve emergency theatre efficiency and workflow sustainability.