A systematic review and meta-analysis: value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions.

BACKGROUND

In recent years, according to global statistics, breast cancer is the main disease affecting women. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) has become a frequently used method for breast cancer detection because of its accuracy, simplicity, and fewer complications.

METHODS

In PubMed, Medline, EMbase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials, the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to March 2021, and the keywords included breast tumor, breast cancer-related diseases, breast lesions, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, sensitivity and specificity. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles were included using a random-effects model that pooled the sensitivity, specificity, and other accuracy measures of VAB. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) characteristic curve was used to summarize the overall accuracy. The sensitivity range was 0.94 to 1.00 (mean, 0.981; 95% CI, 0.972-0.987) with a specificity range of 0.87-1.00 (mean, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.997-0.999). The preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was 93.84 (95% CI, 41.55-211.95), the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.09), the sensitivity and specificity of χ2 were 37.10 (P=0.011) and 32.00 (P=0.043), respectively, while those of PLR, NLR, and duration of response (DOR) were 46.98 (P=0.001), 54.92 (P=0.001), and 43.49 (P=0.002), respectively. Differences were considerable.

DISCUSSION: In this meta-analysis, a total of 10 articles were included. VAB is an accurate type of biopsy to detect female breast cancer. The results of the meta-analysis were stable, and VAB had high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (nearly 100%).