MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · European annals of allergy and clinical immunology · 2003

Prevalence and treatment of allergic rhinitis in Italian conscripts.

Cirillo Ignazio, Vizzaccaro Andrea, Tosca Maria Angela, Milanese Manlio, Ciprandi Giorgio

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Previous surveys on Italian conscripts showed a low prevalence of allergic rhinitis. This study investigated the prevalence and the treatment of allergic rhinitis in the "conscript model" during a four-year period (1999-2002).

METHODS

28,327 18-year old males were screened and referred to La Spezia Military Navy Hospital for call-up visit. Detailed history, clinical examination, skin prick test, spirometry, and metacholine challenge were performed in subjects with suspected diagnosis of respiratory allergy.

RESULTS

Allergic rhinitis was diagnosed in 2,876 conscripts (10.15%). Most of them showed an association with asthma (67.2%). Prevalence of allergic rhinitis increased five-fold in comparison with a previous survey. Sneezing was the most common nasal symptom. The use of antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids increased significantly. However, about one third of the rhinitis subjects did not receive any treatment at all.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of allergic rhinitis in Italian conscripts has increased. Treatment of allergic rhinitis was correctly based on antihistamines and corticosteroids, but many rhinitis subjects remained still untreated.

Для цитирования: Cirillo Ignazio, Vizzaccaro Andrea, Tosca Maria Angela, Milanese Manlio, Ciprandi Giorgio. Prevalence and treatment of allergic rhinitis in Italian conscripts.. European annals of allergy and clinical immunology. 2003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.