DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.06.013
Fluid therapy and acute kidney injury in cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest.
Аннотация
AIM OF THE STUDY: It has recently been suggested that acute kidney injury (AKI) may strongly be influenced by post-resuscitation disease and cardiogenic shock (CS), and may not just be a consequence of cardiac arrest and time without spontaneous circulation. AKI also has been suggested as a strong independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Therefore the present study aimed at investigating the effect of fluid management on the incidence of AKI in patients with cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest treated by mild therapeutic hypothermia.
METHODS
Fluid therapy and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was retrospectively reviewed in 51 patients with cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest comparing patients with and without hemodynamic (PPV, SVV) and volumetric (ELWI, GEDI) monitoring.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in baseline or cardiac arrest characteristics between hemodynamic monitored patients and conventional monitored patients. 28 patients were monitored by standard monitoring, in 23 patients monitoring was complemented by a PICCO system. In the first 24h of treatment the total amount of fluid was significantly higher in patients under PICCO monitoring compared to conventional monitoring (4375±1285ml vs. 5449±1438ml, p=0.007). This was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of AKI (RIFLE 'I'/'F': PICCO-group: 1 (4.3%) vs. conventional group 8 (28.6%), p=0.03).
CONCLUSION
The presented data suggest that volume therapy guided by volumetric (ELWI, GEDI) and arterial waveform derived variables (PPV, SVV) can reduce the incidence of AKI in patients with cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.