DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08207.x
Changed pattern in the use of episiotomy in Sweden.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To study changes in the use of episiotomy since 1989, controlling for variables such as severe tears, epidural anaesthesia, duration of the second stage of labour, instrumental deliveries, birthweight and maternal position at delivery.
DESIGN
Retrospective study. Data were obtained from original birth records and questionnaires.
SETTING
Huddinge University Hospital and all labour wards (n = 62) in Sweden.
POPULATION: 10,661 women who were delivered vaginally (4575 nulliparae, 6086 multiparae) between 1992 and 1994, and 3366 nulliparae delivered in all Swedish hospitals during the month of March 1995.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episiotomy rates, severe tears and instrumental deliveries.
RESULTS
The rate of episiotomy was 1% and of severe tears 0.6% among multiparae delivered vaginally (including instrumental deliveries) at Huddinge University Hospital between 1992 and 1994. The rate of episiotomy was 6.6% and of severe tears 2.3% among nulliparae. Vacuum extraction and epidural anaesthesia were more commonly associated with episiotomy. Factors significantly associated with severe tears were infant birthweight > or = 4000 g, vacuum extraction and episiotomy. In all Swedish labour wards in 1995 the mean incidence of episiotomy in nulliparae was 24.5%, a significant decrease from 33.7% in 1989. Wide variations occurred between hospitals (4%-50%).
CONCLUSION
The use of episiotomy was much reduced at Huddinge University Hospital, with a consistently low rate of severe tears. This supports the growing evidence for individualised and restrictive use of episiotomy at childbirth.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.