World journal of urology · 2025
Safety and efficacy of aquablation in men 80 years or older: an analysis of the international collaborative aquablation research urology society (ICARUS) real-world database.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murad Liam, Hamouda Aalya, Bouhadana David, Lee Nick, Ohana Ilan, Quintas Juan Justo, Cabral Joshua, Leathead Anouk, Saibi Augustin, Corsi Nicholas, Chang Cecilia, Rodrigues Tiago, Glaser Alexander P, Helfand Brian T, Zorn Kevin C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Aquablation is under-researched, especially in the elderly. As older patients face higher risks of surgical complications, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Aquablation in octogenarians. METHODS: This retrospective, multi-center study includes 2136 patients who underwent Aquablation between 2018 and 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts, ≥ 80 and < 80 years of age, consisting of 206 and 1930 men, respectively. Data included baseline characteristics, operative characteristics, and post-operative functional outcomes. Peri-operative events were compared. RESULTS: Men ≥ 80 had higher rates of anxiety/depression (32% vs 16%, p = 0.0032), 5α-reductase inhibitor use (35% vs 19%, p = 0.0009), and anticoagulation (56% vs 24%, p < 0.0001). Mean prostate volume was similar between groups, but men ≥ 80 were less likely to have a median lobe (52% vs 63%, p = 0.003). Both groups showed similar improvements in peak urinary flow rate, post-void residual, International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life. Men ≥ 80 had higher rates of take-back for cystoscopy/clot evacuation (4.4% vs 1.9%, p = 0.034), transfusions (2.9% vs 0.5%, p = 0.003) and 30-day readmissions (4.2% vs 0.7%, p = 0.002). Age and urinary retention were associated with a composite bleeding outcome. There were no changes in erectile function and no differences in retrograde ejaculation between groups. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to assess Aquablation's safety and efficacy across all ages. Aquablation offers similar voiding improvements in men aged ≥ 80 as in younger men, with slightly higher perioperative risks. Thus, Aquablation should be considered for well-selected, elderly patients with significant BPH who wish to preserve sexual function. However, as fewer than half of patients had follow-up beyond 8 months, these findings primarily reflect short-term outcomes.