Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
Cardiovascular endpoints in relation to the central arterial pressure-time indexes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Qi-Fang, An De-Wei, Aparicio Lucas S, Cheng Yi-Bang, Wei Fang-Fei, Boggia José, Yang Wen-Yi, Sheng Chang-Sheng, Martens Dries S, Stolarz-Skrzypek Katarzyna, Wojciechowska Wiktoria, Rajzer Marek, Tikhonoff Valérie, Casiglia Edoardo, Gilis-Malinowska Natasza, Narkiewicz Krzysztof, Seidlerová Jitka, Filipovský Jan, Kawecka-Jaszcz Kalina, Wang Ji-Guang, Nawrot Tim S, Li Yan, Staessen Jan A, International database of central arterial properties for risk stratification investigators
Аннотация
Multiple articles focused on the central arterial systolic (SPTI) and diastolic (DPTI) pressure-time indexes and the subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR). However, whether these indexes contribute to risk stratification in the general population is unknown. SPTI, DPTI and SEVR were noninvasively measured by the SphygmoCor technology. Incidence rates and standardized (per 1-SD increment) multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular (primary) and cardiac endpoints and stroke were evaluated in the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n = 5099). Model refinement was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and the integrated discrimination (IDI) and net reclassification (NRI) improvement. Over 4 years (median), 215 cardiovascular, 133 cardiac endpoints and 79 strokes occurred. For SPTI, fully adjusted HRs were 1.37 (95% CI: 1.18-1.59), 1.35 (1.11-1.64) and 1.33 (1.05-1.69) for the cardiovascular and cardiac endpoints and stroke. The corresponding HRs for DPTI were 1.49 (1.31-1.69), 1.23 (1.02-1.48) and 1.74 (1.46-2.07). For SEVR, none of the HRs reached significance. Analyses with these indexes categorized by quartiles were confirmatory. Analyses stratified by various risk factors did not reveal subgroup differences. For the cardiovascular endpoint, adding SPTI or DPTI to the base model improved the AUC, while adding SPTI or DPTI combined with mean arterial pressure, increased IDI by ~1.7% and NRI by ~17% (P < 0.001 for all). Whereas cardiovascular and cardiac endpoints and stroke were related with the non-invasively measured SPTI and DPTI, SEVR was not.