MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11701-022-01430-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of robotic surgery · 2022

Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases.

Herrera Luis, Escalon Juan, Johnston Matthew, Sanchez Alexis, Sanchez Renata, Mogollon Ivan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Robotic surgery provides significant advantages in terms of an optimal three-dimensional and magnified view of the surgical field, superior maneuverability of surgical instruments, removal of surgeon's tremor and excellent ergonomics. Nonetheless, the adoption of this technology in thoracic surgery has been slower than in other specialties such as urology, gynecology or digestive surgery. In this article we describe our institution's experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in the span from 2012 to 2020. During this time the average annual growth of the program has been 55%. Among the most frequently procedures performed were lobectomies, wedge resection and segmentectomies. Surgical time and length of stay decreased as the number of procedures performed increased, relative to the learning curve. Additional important elements considered relevant to the success of the program are the resources available, leadership, motivation of the surgical team, adequate and stepwise training, as well as the collection of data for periodic analysis of results. All those initiatives have led to a relevant improvement of financial variables reflecting a cost reduction.

Для цитирования: Herrera Luis, Escalon Juan, Johnston Matthew, Sanchez Alexis, Sanchez Renata, Mogollon Ivan. Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases.. Journal of robotic surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01430-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.