DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.006
First paediatric cohort for the evaluation of inflammation in endomyocardial biopsies derived from congenital heart surgery.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis in children and adults. The existing WHO/ISFC criteria for lymphocytic cell infiltrates by are based on the myocardium of adults. The aim of this study was to present a paediatric control cohort for the evaluation of inflammation in EMB of children.
METHODS
In this study endomyocardial tissue from 62 children under 4 years of age was investigated, being collected during a planned open heart surgery with routine resection from ventricular site. Patients had no history of infection or myocardial inflammation. The heart tissue was formalin fixed and embedded in paraffin. Four μm thick tissue sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, and Giemsa. Immunohistochemical stainings included quantitative evaluation of CD3+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, CD68+ macrophages and MHCII expression.
RESULTS
The myocardium was obtained in 96.8% (n = 60) of the cases from the right and in 3.2% (n = 2) from the left ventricle. The median age (interquartile range) at biopsy was 0.5 years (0.3-0.9), 66.1% male. Within this cohort, a median of 2.5/mm2 (1.0-4.0) CD3+ T cells, 0.5/mm2 (0.0-0.6) CD20+ B cells and 4.0/mm2 (2.5-6.0) CD68+ macrophages were detected. The MHC II grade was 0 in 71.0% (n = 44) and 1 in 29.0% (n = 18).
CONCLUSION
This is the first paediatric control cohort being relevant for the correct interpretation of inflammatory heart diseases in EMB. The lymphocytic cell numbers in children needing congenital heart surgery without myocardial inflammation are below the existing values in adults.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.