MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine experimental · 2016

Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock.

Arnemann Philip-Helge, Hessler Michael, Kampmeier Tim, Morelli Andrea, Van Aken Hugo Karel, Westphal Martin, Rehberg Sebastian, Ertmer Christian

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Life-threatening diseases of critically ill patients are known to derange microcirculation. Automatic analysis of microcirculation would provide a bedside diagnostic tool for microcirculatory disorders and allow immediate therapeutic decisions based upon microcirculation analysis.

METHODS

After induction of general anaesthesia and instrumentation for haemodynamic monitoring, haemorrhagic shock was induced in ten female sheep by stepwise blood withdrawal of 3 × 10 mL per kilogram body weight. Before and after the induction of haemorrhagic shock, haemodynamic variables, samples for blood gas analysis, and videos of conjunctival microcirculation were obtained by incident dark field illumination microscopy. Microcirculatory videos were analysed (1) manually with AVA software version 3.2 by an experienced user and (2) automatically by AVA software version 4.2 for total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD) and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV). Correlation between the two analysis methods was examined by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The induction of haemorrhagic shock decreased the mean arterial pressure (from 87 ± 11 to 40 ± 7 mmHg; p < 0.001); stroke volume index (from 38 ± 14 to 20 ± 5 ml·m-2; p = 0.001) and cardiac index (from 2.9 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.5 L·min-1·m-2; p < 0.001) and increased the heart rate (from 72 ± 9 to 87 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001) and lactate concentration (from 0.9 ± 0.3 to 2.0 ± 0.6 mmol·L-1; p = 0.001). Manual analysis showed no change in TVD (17.8 ± 4.2 to 17.8 ± 3.8 mm*mm-2; p = 0.993), whereas PVD (from 15.6 ± 4.6 to 11.5 ± 6.5 mm*mm-2; p = 0.041) and PPV (from 85.9 ± 11.8 to 62.7 ± 29.6%; p = 0.017) decreased significantly. Automatic analysis was not able to identify these changes. Correlation analysis showed a poor correlation between the analysis methods and a wide spread of values in Bland-Altman analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

As characteristic changes in microcirculation during ovine haemorrhagic shock were not detected by automatic analysis and correlation between automatic and manual analyses (current gold standard) was poor, the use of the investigated software for automatic analysis of microcirculation cannot be recommended in its current version at least in the investigated model. Further improvements in automatic vessel detection are needed before its routine use.

Для цитирования: Arnemann Philip-Helge, Hessler Michael, Kampmeier Tim, Morelli Andrea, Van Aken Hugo Karel, Westphal Martin, Rehberg Sebastian, Ertmer Christian. Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock.. Intensive care medicine experimental. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.