Outcomes of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and iliac cancellous bone transplantation on alveolar cleft bone grafting: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

To systematically evaluate the effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and iliac cancellous bone graft (ICBG) on alveolar cleft bone grafting (ACBG) in cleft lip and palate.

METHOD: Online databases were searched for case-control studies related to the application of BMP-2 and ICBG in ACBG.

RESULT: Meta-analysis showed no significant statistical difference in the filling rate (OR = 4.1, 95% CI (0.06, 2.63)), the volume of bone graft area (OR=-0.42, 95% CI (-1.44, 0.60)), the height of bone graft area (OR = -21.38, 95% CI (-23.00, -19.76)), the density of bone graft area (OR = 0.43, 95% CI (-0.79, 1.64)), the failure rate of bone graft (OR = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.03, 0.06)), infection after operation, and the rate (OR = 0.20, 95% CI (0.05, 0.73)) and the incidence of postoperative oronasal fistula (OR = 4.1, 95% CI (0.06, 2.63)) between BMP-2 and ICBG in ACBG. However, there were obvious statistical differences in operative time (OR = -3.64, 95% CI (-7.35, 0.06)) and the length of hospital stay (OR = -1.97, 95% CI (-2.41, -1.53)).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis shows that there is no significant difference between BMP-2 and ICBG in filling rate, volume, density, failure rate, and the occurrence of oronasal fistula after ACBG. There were significant differences between BMP-2 and ICBG in the operation time and hospitalization time of ACBG. Compared with ICBG bone graft, BMP-2 has more advantages in ACBG such as remaining area height, postoperative infection rate, operative time, and length of hospital stay.