MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.004

Медицинская библиотека · European urology oncology · 2024

En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Oncological, Histopathological, and Surgical Outcomes.

Basile Giuseppe, Uleri Alessandro, Leni Riccardo, Cannoletta Donato, Afferi Luca, Baboudjian Michael, Diana Pietro, D'Andrea David, Teoh Jeremy, Pradere Benjamin, Subiela José D, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Seisen Thomas, Rouprêt Morgan, Briganti Alberto, Montorsi Francesco, Moschini Marco, Breda Alberto, Gallioli Andrea, European Association of Urology—Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been introduced to enhance the quality of resection of bladder cancer. This review aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials published until May 2024. The primary outcomes were the risk of recurrence and progression. The secondary outcomes were detrusor muscle (DM) presence, muscularis mucosae (MM) detectability, bladder perforation and obturator nerve reflex rates, operative time, length of catheterization and hospitalization, and residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference was observed in 12-mo recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.02; p = 0.08), 24-mo recurrence (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85-1.22; p = 0.8), and 12-mo progression (RR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.05-10.14; p = 0.8) rates. ERBT was significantly associated with a higher DM presence (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; p = 0.02), while no statistically significant difference emerged in the residual tumor at reTURBT and MM detectability (all p > 0.05). ERBT was significantly associated with a lower risk of bladder perforation (p = 0.002) and obturator nerve reflex (p < 0.001). Finally, ERBT was significantly associated with longer operative time, lower catheterization time, and lower length of hospital stay. The main limitation was heterogeneity among the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: ERBT is safer due to fewer intraoperative events, but there was no significant difference in oncological outcomes compared with cTURBT. Higher DM detection with ERBT enhances initial disease stratification, potentially improving clinical decision-making and care delivery.

PATIENT SUMMARY: En bloc resection of bladder tumors is associated with lower intraoperative complications than and superior histopathological information to the conventional resection technique. However, the absence of a difference in oncological outcomes underscores the influence of factors such as tumor characteristics, surgeon expertise, and postoperative care on subsequent events.

Для цитирования: Basile Giuseppe, Uleri Alessandro, Leni Riccardo, Cannoletta Donato, Afferi Luca, Baboudjian Michael, Diana Pietro, D'Andrea David, Teoh Jeremy, Pradere Benjamin, Subiela José D, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Seisen Thomas, Rouprêt Morgan, Briganti Alberto, Montorsi Francesco, Moschini Marco, Breda Alberto, Gallioli Andrea, European Association of Urology—Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group. En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Oncological, Histopathological, and Surgical Outcomes.. European urology oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.