Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2009
The effect of guided imagery on the third stage of labor: a pilot study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schorn Mavis N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to test the effects of guided imagery on blood loss during the third stage of labor.
DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a three-group randomized controlled trial. Recruitment was conducted from a university nurse-midwifery practice.
SUBJECTS: Sixty (60) women between pregnancy weeks 36 and 38 participated.
INTERVENTIONS: The women were randomized into experimental, placebo, and control groups.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrauterine pressure catheters were used to measure uterine contraction frequency and intensity. Blood loss was measured. Analysis of variance was used to compare the three groups on continuous variables.
RESULTS: Complete data were collected on 41 subjects. No significant differences were found among the groups on demographic or potentially confounding variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood loss was nominally lower in the experimental group, but conclusions cannot be drawn due to the sample size.
DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a three-group randomized controlled trial. Recruitment was conducted from a university nurse-midwifery practice.
SUBJECTS: Sixty (60) women between pregnancy weeks 36 and 38 participated.
INTERVENTIONS: The women were randomized into experimental, placebo, and control groups.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrauterine pressure catheters were used to measure uterine contraction frequency and intensity. Blood loss was measured. Analysis of variance was used to compare the three groups on continuous variables.
RESULTS: Complete data were collected on 41 subjects. No significant differences were found among the groups on demographic or potentially confounding variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood loss was nominally lower in the experimental group, but conclusions cannot be drawn due to the sample size.