[Port catheter fractures in 361 implanted port systems. Analysis of the causes--possible solutions--review of the literature].
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The use of a venous port-catheter-system is known as a relatively safe implant. Besides infections, the breakage of PIPS is the most common reason for explanation before term. The purpose of this study is to analyse port-related complications and to show ways of preventing them.
METHOD: Between 1.1.1994 and 31.12.1999, 391 PIPS were implanted in the V. subclavia with the Seldinger technique at Surgical Clinic 1 of the University of Leipzig. Subsequently, 311 of them were followed up until 31.12.2000, with a mean observation time of 45 months.
RESULTS
We registered 48 complications altogether (15.4% of 311), 21(6.7%) of which occurred immediately after implantation (up to 30 days postoperatively). These could be divided either into wound-healing disorders/pulmonary distress (4.5%, n = 14) or complications concerning the catheter systems (2.3%, n = 7). Long-term complications after 31 days were evident in 27 patients (8.7%), due either to infections (4.5%, n = 13) or catheter-associated problems (4.5%, n = 14). Catheter lesions occurred in nine cases (2.9% out of 311) at the point of entry into the musculus pectoralis, i.e., where the catheter had to change direction. Typically these were lengthways tears caused by the catheter. We observed one full breakage without dislocation, and two dislocated catheter fragments in the systemic circulation. We consider the change of direction to be responsible for wear on the silicon catheter. During implantation, extreme change of direction of the catheter should be avoided because this is where breakage happens. Catheter implantation by means of exposure of the vena basilica in the infraclavicular triangle is the method of choice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.