Midwives' Evaluation of a Neonatal Resuscitation in High- and Low-Resource Settings.

Aim: To assess midwives' evaluation of a real-life neonatal resuscitation and their opinion on importance of resuscitation interventions.

Methods

Multicenter, multi-country study.

Setting

Beira Central Hospital (Mozambique) and Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (Italy). Subjects: Sixteen Mozambican midwives and 18 Italian midwives. Interventions: Midwives' assessment was evaluated by using a predefined score, which graded each resuscitation intervention (0-2 points) and summed to a total score for each step (initial steps, bag-mask ventilation, and chest compressions). All scores were compared with referral scores given by two expert neonatologists.

Results

Both Mozambican and Italian midwives overestimated their performance regarding of initial steps taken during resuscitation, chest compressions, high-oxygen concentrations (p < 0.01), and underestimated the importance of stimulation (p < 0.05). Mozambicans overestimated suctioning (p < 0.001). Participants agreed with experts about the importance of equipment preparation, using a warmer, drying the newborn, removing wet linen and heart rate assessment.

Conclusion

Mozambican and Italian midwives overestimated the performance of a real-life neonatal resuscitation, with heterogeneous evaluation of the importance of several aspects of neonatal resuscitation. These findings may be useful for identifying educational goals.