MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1259/dmfr/24985971

Медицинская библиотека · Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2012

A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT.

Mahajan Sanjay K, Babu Sharath N M, Sharma Dhruv, Singh Digvijay, Kanga Anil, Kaushal Satinder S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT (CBCT) images compared with multidetector CT (MDCT) images for the detection of surface osseous changes in temporomandibular joints (TMJs).

METHODS

Naked-eye inspection of 110 sites in 10 TMJs from 5 dry human skulls provided the gold standard. Two radiologists interpreted the images. Sensitivity, specificity and kappa statistics were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of both modalities were low and comparable whereas the specificities were high and comparable. Intraobserver reliabilities for CBCT (p=0.0005) and for MDCT (p=0.0001) showed significant agreement. Interobserver reliability was higher for CBCT than for MDCT.

CONCLUSION

CBCT and MDCT accuracy was comparable in detecting surface osseous changes with comparable intraobserver reliabilities. However, since CBCT requires less radiation exposure, it should be encouraged for imaging TMJ with suspected surface osseous changes.

Для цитирования: Mahajan Sanjay K, Babu Sharath N M, Sharma Dhruv, Singh Digvijay, Kanga Anil, Kaushal Satinder S. A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT.. Dento maxillo facial radiology. 2012. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/24985971.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.