MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.027

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of emergency medicine · 2023

Effect of the Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma on the Screening Performance of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Chest Decision Instrument.

Grade Madeline M, Ehlers Paul F, Kornblith Aaron E, Mower William R, Raja Ali S, Schleifer Jessica, Liteplo Andrew, Rodriguez Robert M

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

Developed to decrease unnecessary thoracic computed tomography use in adult blunt trauma patients, the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) Chest clinical decision instrument does not include the extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST). We assessed whether eFAST improves the NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument's diagnostic performance and may replace the chest radiograph (CXR) as a predictor variable.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of prospective data from 8 Level I trauma centers from 2011-2014. We compared performance of modified clinical decision instruments that (1) added eFAST as a predictor (eFAST-added clinical decision instrument), and (2) replaced CXR with eFAST (eFAST-replaced clinical decision instrument), in screening for blunt thoracic injuries.

RESULTS

One thousand nine hundred fifty-seven patients had documented computed tomography, CXR, clinical NEXUS criteria, and adequate eFAST; 624 (31.9%) patients had blunt thoracic injuries, and 126 (6.4%) had major injuries. Compared to the NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument, the eFAST-added clinical decision instrument demonstrated unchanged screening performance for major injury (sensitivity 0.98 [0.94 to 1.00], specificity 0.28 [0.26 to 0.30]) or any injury (sensitivity 0.97 [0.95 to 0.98], specificity 0.21 [0.19 to 0.23]). The eFAST-replaced clinical decision instrument demonstrated unchanged sensitivity for major injury (sensitivity 0.93 [0.87 to 0.97], specificity 0.31 [0.29 to 0.34]) and decreased sensitivity for any injury (0.93 [0.91 to 0.951] versus 0.97 [0.953 to 0.98]).

CONCLUSION

In our secondary analysis, adding eFAST as a predictor variable did not improve the diagnostic screening performance of the original NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument; eFAST cannot replace the CXR criterion of the NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument.

Для цитирования: Grade Madeline M, Ehlers Paul F, Kornblith Aaron E, Mower William R, Raja Ali S, Schleifer Jessica, Liteplo Andrew, Rodriguez Robert M. Effect of the Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma on the Screening Performance of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Chest Decision Instrument.. Annals of emergency medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.