Sleep · 2017
Optimizing MSLT Specificity in Narcolepsy With Cataplexy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murer Tobias, Imbach Lukas L, Hackius Marc, Taddei Raquel N, Werth Esther, Poryazova Rositsa, Gavrilov Yury V, Winkler Sophie, Waldvogel Daniel, Baumann Christian R, Valko Philipp O
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Multiple sleep onset rapid eye movement (R) periods (SOREMPs) and a mean sleep latency of ≤8 minutes on the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) are diagnostic criteria of narcolepsy (NC), but also occur in other conditions with increased sleep pressure, including insufficient sleep syndrome (ISS), sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), or Parkinson's disease (PD). These false positives are common, may create diagnostic uncertainty, and highlight the need for complementary MSLT measures with high specificity for NC.
METHODS: Detailed analysis of MSLT findings in 56 NC, 83 PD, 89 SDB, and 23 ISS patients, using receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: A positive MSLT (mean sleep latency ≤ 8.0 minutes and ≥2 SOREMPs) was found in 53 NC (95%), 1 PD (1%), 8 SDB (9%), and 12 ISS patients (52%). MSLT-based differentiation between NC and non-NC patients was best when applying a mean R latency of ≤5 minutes (sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value [PPV]: 49%/95%/96%) or a mean percentage of sleep stage R ≥ 40% (sensitivity/specificity/PPV: 60%/100%/100%) as cutoffs. When analyzing all 252 naps with SOREMPs in isolation, the combination of both R latency of ≤5 minutes and R percentage of ≥50% yielded a sensitivity/specificity/PPV of 50%/99%/99%. In addition, a sleep stage sequence with R occurring prior to N2 was more common in NC than in non-NC (71% vs. 32%, p < .001), and in combination with R percentage of ≥50% yielded a sensitivity/specificity/PPV of 53%/96%/97%.
CONCLUSIONS: A better characterization of R sleep by latency, duration, and sleep stage sequence facilitates detection of false positives and, hence, contributes to a higher MSLT specificity in NC.
METHODS: Detailed analysis of MSLT findings in 56 NC, 83 PD, 89 SDB, and 23 ISS patients, using receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: A positive MSLT (mean sleep latency ≤ 8.0 minutes and ≥2 SOREMPs) was found in 53 NC (95%), 1 PD (1%), 8 SDB (9%), and 12 ISS patients (52%). MSLT-based differentiation between NC and non-NC patients was best when applying a mean R latency of ≤5 minutes (sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value [PPV]: 49%/95%/96%) or a mean percentage of sleep stage R ≥ 40% (sensitivity/specificity/PPV: 60%/100%/100%) as cutoffs. When analyzing all 252 naps with SOREMPs in isolation, the combination of both R latency of ≤5 minutes and R percentage of ≥50% yielded a sensitivity/specificity/PPV of 50%/99%/99%. In addition, a sleep stage sequence with R occurring prior to N2 was more common in NC than in non-NC (71% vs. 32%, p < .001), and in combination with R percentage of ≥50% yielded a sensitivity/specificity/PPV of 53%/96%/97%.
CONCLUSIONS: A better characterization of R sleep by latency, duration, and sleep stage sequence facilitates detection of false positives and, hence, contributes to a higher MSLT specificity in NC.