MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.73.1194

Медицинская библиотека · Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases · 1999

[Analysis of prevalent Orientia tsutsugamushi in Aichi Prefecture].

Yamashita T, Morishita T, Tsuzuki H, Sakae K, Suzuki Y, Kadosaka T, Kasuya S

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Orientia tsutsugamushi was isolated from one of 8 patients' sera in Aichi Prefecture, and was identified to have the same antigenicity with the KN-2 strain (KN-2 like) based on the reactivity with 13 types of strain-specific or cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies to Karp, Gilliam, and Kato strains. Four isolates from 4 unfed larvae and adult of Leptotrombidium pallidum were also classified as the KN-3 like strains. Using indirect immunofluorescence, sera from 20 patients with tsutsugamushi disease were tested for reactivity with KN-1, KN-2, KN-3, and GJ-1 strains, isolated from patients in Gifu Prefecture. Fifteen sera showed the highest titer against KN-2 strain in Immunogloburin M (IgM). Of the other 5, three were higher for KN-3 strain in IgM, and two were KN-1 or GJ-1, respectively. These results suggested that KN-2 like strains were prevalent in the region where the number of patients has been ranked the highest in Aichi Prefecture. KN-1, KN-3, and GJ-1 like strains were also existed in this area. KN-3 like strain was likely to be distributed in another area. Aichi Prefecture.

Для цитирования: Yamashita T, Morishita T, Tsuzuki H, Sakae K, Suzuki Y, Kadosaka T, Kasuya S. [Analysis of prevalent Orientia tsutsugamushi in Aichi Prefecture].. Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 1999. DOI: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.73.1194.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.