The journal of sexual medicine · 2022
Luteinizing Hormone Suppression Profiles in Men Treated With Exogenous Testosterone.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miranda Eduardo P, Schofield Elizabeth, Matsushita Kazuhito, Katz Darren J, Nelson Christian J, Benfante Nicole, Mulhall John P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Due to the negative feedback mechanism involved in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, testosterone therapy (TTh) may result in suppression of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, but clinical experience demonstrates the level of LH suppression is variable.
AIM: We sought to define the relationship between TTh and LH levels, specifically predictors of LH suppression in men on TTh.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with testosterone deficiency (TD) treated with TTh. Patient demographic and clinical data including vascular risk factor (VRF) status were collected. Serum total T and LH levels before TTh and after ≥3 months (m) were recorded. LH suppression was defined as serum LH level <1.0 IU/ml.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of LH suppression were searched though a series of logistic regression models assessing suppression status at the final observation, and then a series of Cox proportional hazards models assessing time to first suppression were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 227 patients with mean age of 58±14 years at time of TTh initiation were included in our analysis. Just under half of subjects received transdermal T as the only modality (n = 101, 44%), while one third (n = 77, 34%) received intramuscular only, and the remainder (n = 49, 22%) received both modalities during follow-up. The mean baseline LH level was 10 ± 12 IU/ml. The percent of men who had baseline LH level above 1 IU/ml and at any given point of TTh was 84% and 78%, respectively, thus 22% of men had suppressed LH levels on TTh considering the definition of LH <1 IU/ml. Most men (73%) had a suppressed LH level of <1 IU/ml at least once during follow-up. In the final adjusted model for LH suppression, intramuscular route (OR = 2.44), baseline LH (OR = 0.94), estradiol (OR = 1.05) remained significant.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: LH suppression profiles may be relevant for dose titration during TTh and perhaps to minimize testicular atrophy.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A strict definition for TD was applied using LCMS for T measurements and patients had long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: While 73% of patients had at least one LH <1 IU/ml during TTh, only 22% maintained suppressed throughout the treatment. Miranda EP, Schofield E, Matsushita K, et al. Luteinizing Hormone Suppression Profiles in Men Treated With Exogenous Testosterone. J Sex Med 2022;19:1359-1365.
AIM: We sought to define the relationship between TTh and LH levels, specifically predictors of LH suppression in men on TTh.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with testosterone deficiency (TD) treated with TTh. Patient demographic and clinical data including vascular risk factor (VRF) status were collected. Serum total T and LH levels before TTh and after ≥3 months (m) were recorded. LH suppression was defined as serum LH level <1.0 IU/ml.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictors of LH suppression were searched though a series of logistic regression models assessing suppression status at the final observation, and then a series of Cox proportional hazards models assessing time to first suppression were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 227 patients with mean age of 58±14 years at time of TTh initiation were included in our analysis. Just under half of subjects received transdermal T as the only modality (n = 101, 44%), while one third (n = 77, 34%) received intramuscular only, and the remainder (n = 49, 22%) received both modalities during follow-up. The mean baseline LH level was 10 ± 12 IU/ml. The percent of men who had baseline LH level above 1 IU/ml and at any given point of TTh was 84% and 78%, respectively, thus 22% of men had suppressed LH levels on TTh considering the definition of LH <1 IU/ml. Most men (73%) had a suppressed LH level of <1 IU/ml at least once during follow-up. In the final adjusted model for LH suppression, intramuscular route (OR = 2.44), baseline LH (OR = 0.94), estradiol (OR = 1.05) remained significant.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: LH suppression profiles may be relevant for dose titration during TTh and perhaps to minimize testicular atrophy.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: A strict definition for TD was applied using LCMS for T measurements and patients had long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: While 73% of patients had at least one LH <1 IU/ml during TTh, only 22% maintained suppressed throughout the treatment. Miranda EP, Schofield E, Matsushita K, et al. Luteinizing Hormone Suppression Profiles in Men Treated With Exogenous Testosterone. J Sex Med 2022;19:1359-1365.