DOI 10.1007/s00392-025-02665-w
Comparative analysis of therapeutic strategies in atrial fibrillation patients with left atrial appendage thrombus despite optimal NOAC therapy.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is the primary cause of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF). Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) effectively reduce LAA thrombus prevalence and stroke risk. However, the optimal treatment of a NOAC-resistant thrombus remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate therapeutic strategies for resolving LAA thrombus in patients on optimal NOAC therapy.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed patients scheduled for cardioversion or catheter ablation of AF between 2014 and 2023 with LAA thrombus on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) despite being on optimal NOAC therapy. We assessed how the applied management strategy affected thrombus resolution.
RESULTS
Among the analyzed 120 patients, a change to a different NOAC occurred in 41% of cases, a transition to a VKA in 30%, and the supplementation with antiplatelet therapy in 11%. In contrast, 18% of the patients received unchanged therapy. Follow-up imaging at 65 [44 - 95] days showed successful thrombus resolution in 92 (77%) of cases, predicted by a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (p = 0.01). Any modification of antithrombotic therapy was an independent predictor of thrombus resolution (OR 5.28 [1.55-18], p = 0.01). Of the four strategies, there was a trend toward better thrombus resolution with switching to a VKA (OR 3.23 [1.03-10.1], p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
Resolution of LAA thrombus in patients already on adequate NOAC treatment may require a revision of the anticoagulation strategy. In addition, transitioning from NOAC to VKA might be considered.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.