ANZ journal of surgery · 2021
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of arteriovenous dialysis access flow using ultrasound.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yii Erwin, Yii Ming Kon, Thwaites Stephen, Zhu John, Chong Timothy, Tong Lauren, Nair Sachin
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS: Despite numerous studies investigating the use of ultrasound (US) in assessing arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), there are no universally agreed threshold flow velocities in diagnosing significantly abnormal flow that are useful in predicting thrombotic flow-related dysfunction. This study evaluates a predictive model using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses to establish threshold velocities.
METHODS: Five hundred and eleven US scans were analysed. ROC curves were used to determine the optimal threshold time average mean velocity (TAMV), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) of the brachial artery supplying the AVF in determining the need for intervention or thrombosis within 3 months of the scans. Estimated flow volume (FV) ROC was used as an evaluative comparison.
RESULTS: There were 356 negative and 155 positive scan results in relation to the need for intervention or thrombosis. Empirical flow velocity parameters of TAMV, EDV and PSV were analysed using ROC curves, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95, 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. FV ROC analysis yields a comparative AUC of 0.90. A TAMV cut-off at 48.6 cm/s yielded the highest AUC. Subgroup analysis yielded an optimal TAMV cut-off of 45 cm/s for forearm and 49 cm/s for arm AVF. The EDV was also highly predictive of outcomes. PSV has the lowest accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The TAMV of inflow brachial artery to AVF is highly predictive of outcomes of thrombotic flow-related dysfunction. Our study confirms TAMV cut-offs of 45 cm/s for forearm and 49 cm/s for arm AVF. These results require prospective validation.
METHODS: Five hundred and eleven US scans were analysed. ROC curves were used to determine the optimal threshold time average mean velocity (TAMV), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) of the brachial artery supplying the AVF in determining the need for intervention or thrombosis within 3 months of the scans. Estimated flow volume (FV) ROC was used as an evaluative comparison.
RESULTS: There were 356 negative and 155 positive scan results in relation to the need for intervention or thrombosis. Empirical flow velocity parameters of TAMV, EDV and PSV were analysed using ROC curves, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95, 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. FV ROC analysis yields a comparative AUC of 0.90. A TAMV cut-off at 48.6 cm/s yielded the highest AUC. Subgroup analysis yielded an optimal TAMV cut-off of 45 cm/s for forearm and 49 cm/s for arm AVF. The EDV was also highly predictive of outcomes. PSV has the lowest accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The TAMV of inflow brachial artery to AVF is highly predictive of outcomes of thrombotic flow-related dysfunction. Our study confirms TAMV cut-offs of 45 cm/s for forearm and 49 cm/s for arm AVF. These results require prospective validation.