MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.12.012

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of microbiological methods · 2009

Evaluation of serological tests for the diagnosis of rickettsiosis in Denmark.

Kantsø Bjørn, Svendsen Claus Bo, Jørgensen Charlotte Svaerke, Krogfelt Karen A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Two commercially available immunofluorescence assays (IFA) were compared using historical sera evaluated for rickettsial antibodies by the Weil-Felix test. An IFA test produced by Focus Diagnostics prepared with Rickettsia rickettsii and R. typhi antigens was compared with a custom made kit from Fuller Laboratories with R. rickettsii, R. typhi, R. conorii and R. helvetica as antigens. The serum panel used for the comparison included Weil-Felix-positive and -negative samples. Cross-reactions were analyzed using serum samples from patients with clinical symptoms similar to those of rickettsiosis. When analyzing the data using the manufacturers' cut-off values, 41% of samples from presumably healthy blood donors were found positive for spotted fever group Rickettsia antibodies. This does not correlate to the general picture of rickettsiosis in Denmark. Furthermore, sera with Coxiella burnetii antibodies were found to be cross-reacting in both tests. When applying cut-off values calculated on the 95% percentile on data from blood donor serum samples, there was no significant difference between the two kits. Moreover, when using the newly established cut-off, cross-reactions were eliminated.

Для цитирования: Kantsø Bjørn, Svendsen Claus Bo, Jørgensen Charlotte Svaerke, Krogfelt Karen A. Evaluation of serological tests for the diagnosis of rickettsiosis in Denmark.. Journal of microbiological methods. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.12.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.