The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence.

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence (USI).

DESIGN

A historical cohort with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

SETTING

Two tertiary, university-affiliated referral centers.

PATIENTS: Women with USI who had either a laparoscopic Burch (31 women) or an abdominal Burch procedure (31). They were matched for the type of procedure as well as any concurrent procedures.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

The primary outcome was cure, defined as the absence of USI subjectively as described by the patient, and objectively as confirmed by urodynamic and stress tests. Cost data were extracted from hospital charts and office records. To calculate costs we assessed professional fees (physicians, nurses, nursing assistants), investigations (laboratory tests, radiology, urodynamics), drugs, capital equipment, disposable equipment, and length of stay. The cure rates were 97% and 90%, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 1.2 years (range 1-2.5 yrs) for a laparoscopic Burch and 2.7 years (range 1-9 yrs) for an abdominal Burch. Preliminary results showed a significant difference in cost effectiveness between the procedures. The average cost for a laparoscopic Burch was $2938.35 and for an abdominal Burch $5692.30. The higher costs for abdominal Burch were due to increased hospital stay. The cost-effectiveness ratios (cost/cure) were $3029.23 and $6324.78, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess for robustness.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results show that a laparoscopic Burch is more cost-effective than the abdominal Burch in treating women with USI.