Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the management of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with acute stroke.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
We compared the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for resolving left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in patients with acute stroke with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
METHODS
Among consecutive patients with acute stroke admitted to five major comprehensive stroke centers in Japan between January 2017 and December 2022, those with NVAF and LAA thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and underwent follow-up TEE were included. All patients received DOAC or warfarin treatment. We compared the clinical characteristics, changes in LAA thrombus size, resolution, recurrent stroke, and bleeding complications within 3 months of stroke onset.
RESULTS
This study included 63 patients (DOAC group, 22; warfarin group, 41). Sex, age, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores on admission did not significantly differ between the groups. The initial LAA thrombus size was 0.83 cm2 and 0.88 cm2 in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. On follow-up evaluation 10 days after initial TEE, LAA thrombus was completely resolved in 59 % and 34 % of patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Multivariable analysis revealed DOAC treatment as an independent factor for LAA thrombus resolution (odds ratio, 3.21; 95 % confidence interval: 1.07-10.23, P = 0.04). Recurrent stroke occurred in one and three patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. No intracerebral hemorrhage cases were observed in either group within 3 months of stroke onset.
CONCLUSION
In patients with acute stroke with NVAF and LAA thrombus detected by TEE, DOACs may be more effective than warfarin in resolving LAA thrombus.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.