Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2016
p16 Immunohistochemistry in Colposcope-Directed and Random Cervical Biopsies of CIN2 and CIN3.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arvizo Cynthia, Chen Qing, Du Hui, Wang Chun, Tang Jinlong, Yang Bin, Pretorius Robert G, Wu Ruifang, Belinson Jerome Leslie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if there is a different p16 expression pattern between colposcope-directed and random (colposcope-undetectable) biopsies of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) and CIN3.
METHODS: Cervical biopsies that were positive for CIN2 or CIN3 were selected from a database of samples acquired during a large population-based clinical trial in Guangdong Province in China (Shenzhen Cervical Cancer Screening Study II). Blocks were recut, reread, and then immunostained for p16. Biopsies were categorized as either colposcope-directed or random biopsies. Diffuse staining was considered p16 positive, whereas focal or no staining was considered p16 negative. Differences were determined by the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Among the patients with CIN3, there were 232 individual biopsies of CIN3. Sixty were randomly collected, and 172 were colposcopy directed. p16 positivity for the colposcope-directed and random biopsies was 97.7% and 91.7%, respectively (p = 0.052). Like the CIN3 biopsies, colposcope-directed and random CIN2 samples expressed p16 similarly (86.8% [46/53] and 82.6% [19/23], p = .73, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, even small colposcope-undetectable biopsies of CIN3 are significant. Random biopsies of CIN2 or CIN3 demonstrate similar p16 positivity as visible lesions and therefore might be expected to have a similar natural history.
METHODS: Cervical biopsies that were positive for CIN2 or CIN3 were selected from a database of samples acquired during a large population-based clinical trial in Guangdong Province in China (Shenzhen Cervical Cancer Screening Study II). Blocks were recut, reread, and then immunostained for p16. Biopsies were categorized as either colposcope-directed or random biopsies. Diffuse staining was considered p16 positive, whereas focal or no staining was considered p16 negative. Differences were determined by the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Among the patients with CIN3, there were 232 individual biopsies of CIN3. Sixty were randomly collected, and 172 were colposcopy directed. p16 positivity for the colposcope-directed and random biopsies was 97.7% and 91.7%, respectively (p = 0.052). Like the CIN3 biopsies, colposcope-directed and random CIN2 samples expressed p16 similarly (86.8% [46/53] and 82.6% [19/23], p = .73, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, even small colposcope-undetectable biopsies of CIN3 are significant. Random biopsies of CIN2 or CIN3 demonstrate similar p16 positivity as visible lesions and therefore might be expected to have a similar natural history.