MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07489.x

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of urology · 1994

The Urolume as a means of treating urinary outflow obstruction and its impact on waiting lists.

Schneider H J, De Souza J V, Palmer J H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the prostatic stenting device--the Urolume--both in terms of relief from urinary outflow obstruction and as a means of reducing waiting lists.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A group of 70 men from the long-term waiting list were chosen for this study. The Urolume, a mesh tube of biomedical superalloy, was successfully introduced in 60 of these patients. The majority had the procedure performed as a day case, under a general anaesthetic.

RESULTS

Seventy-two per cent of patients were symptomatically better when assessed at 6 weeks and their mean peak urinary flow rates had doubled. Early problems included haematuria, urge incontinence and dysuria. Stent displacement necessitating removal occurred in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

This technique offers the surgeon a quick and atraumatic method of relieving urinary outflow obstruction. There are, however, a number of problems associated with this technique which will probably be overcome by modification to the Urolume. As a result of our project, the waiting time for prostatic surgery was reduced from 3 years to under 2 years.

Для цитирования: Schneider H J, De Souza J V, Palmer J H. The Urolume as a means of treating urinary outflow obstruction and its impact on waiting lists.. British journal of urology. 1994. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07489.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.