MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.15.1151

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2002

Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer.

Barlow William E, Lehman Constance D, Zheng Yingye, Ballard-Barbash Rachel, Yankaskas Bonnie C, Cutter Gary R, Carney Patricia A, Geller Berta M, Rosenberg Robert, Kerlikowske Karla, Weaver Donald L, Taplin Stephen H

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer has not been well studied. We evaluated whether age, breast density, self-reported breast lump, and previous mammography influence the performance of diagnostic mammography.

METHODS

From January 1996 through March 1998, prospective diagnostic mammography data from women aged 25-89 years with no previous breast cancer were linked to cancer outcomes data in six mammography registries participating in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. We used the final mammographic assessment at the end of the imaging work-up to determine abnormal mammographic examination rate, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We used age, breast density, prior mammogram, and self-reported breast lump jointly as predictors of performance. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Of 41 427 diagnostic mammograms, 6279 (15.2%) were judged abnormal. The overall PPV was 21.8%, sensitivity was 85.8%, and specificity was 87.7%. Multivariate analysis showed that sensitivity and specificity generally declined as breast density increased (P =.007 and P<.001, respectively), that previous mammography decreased sensitivity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36 to 0.74; P<.001) but increased specificity (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.57; P<.001), and that a self-reported breast lump increased sensitivity (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.38; P =.013) but decreased specificity (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.59; P<.001). ROC analysis showed that higher breast density and previous mammography were negatively related to accuracy (P<.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic mammography in women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer shows higher sensitivity and lower specificity than screening mammography does. Higher breast density and previous mammographic examination appear to impair performance.

Для цитирования: Barlow William E, Lehman Constance D, Zheng Yingye, Ballard-Barbash Rachel, Yankaskas Bonnie C, Cutter Gary R, Carney Patricia A, Geller Berta M, Rosenberg Robert, Kerlikowske Karla, Weaver Donald L, Taplin Stephen H. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer.. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.15.1151.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.