Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025
Neuroscience in prostate cancer.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Ziteng, Peng Qiang, Wang Yuliang, Chiu Peter Ka-Fung, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Wang Rongjiang, Liu Xiaodong, Wu Dinglan, Ng Chi-Fai
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence in cancer neuroscience indicates that the nervous system interacts directly or indirectly with cancer cells, promoting tumor progression. The prostate gland contains an extensive neural network essential for regulating key physiological functions of prostate cells, and the significant neural distribution observed in prostate cancer highlights its critical role in driving cancer pathogenesis. Unfortunately, Comprehensive reviews systematically summarizing progress in cancer neuroscience for prostate cancer are currently lacking.
METHOD: We synthesize existing research on interactions between the nervous system and prostate cancer cells, explore the neural distribution within the prostate, and evaluate the impact of neural innervation on prostate cancer development and progression. Additionally, we also assess the potential neural regulation mechanisms in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC).
RESULT: We found that neural interactions significantly influence prostate cancer development. Neural circuitry within the tumor microenvironment drives progression and contributes to the aggressiveness of lethal subtypes like NEPC. Targeting neuromodulation emerges as a promising therapeutic approach, potentially allowing the repurposing of established medications for treating advanced tumors.
CONCLUSION: Neuromodulation offers a promising therapeutic option for advanced prostate cancer, particularly NEPC, which faces limited treatment options. However, further research is necessary to fully understand the neural regulatory mechanisms involved in prostate cancer development and to identify new therapeutic targets and strategies for advanced stages.
METHOD: We synthesize existing research on interactions between the nervous system and prostate cancer cells, explore the neural distribution within the prostate, and evaluate the impact of neural innervation on prostate cancer development and progression. Additionally, we also assess the potential neural regulation mechanisms in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC).
RESULT: We found that neural interactions significantly influence prostate cancer development. Neural circuitry within the tumor microenvironment drives progression and contributes to the aggressiveness of lethal subtypes like NEPC. Targeting neuromodulation emerges as a promising therapeutic approach, potentially allowing the repurposing of established medications for treating advanced tumors.
CONCLUSION: Neuromodulation offers a promising therapeutic option for advanced prostate cancer, particularly NEPC, which faces limited treatment options. However, further research is necessary to fully understand the neural regulatory mechanisms involved in prostate cancer development and to identify new therapeutic targets and strategies for advanced stages.