Journal of surgical oncology · 2012
Indocyanine green fluorescence-navigated sentinel node biopsy showed higher sensitivity than the radioisotope or blue dye method, which may help to reduce false-negative cases in skin cancer.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujisawa Yasuhiro, Nakamura Yasuhiro, Kawachi Yasuhiro, Otsuka Fujio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy using radioisotope (RI) and blue dye (BD) achieved a high detection rate, approximately 5% of melanomas with negative SLNs develop nodal metastasis. We tested a new lymphatic navigation method using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) to detect such "occult" SLNs.
METHODS: Thirty-four skin cancer patients received SLN biopsy with the following three methods: RI (99Tc-tin colloid), BD (2% patent blue), and ICG (0.5% indocyanine green). Lymph nodes detected by any of the three methods were counted as SLNs.
RESULTS: ICG-FI detected more SLNs in 8 out of the 34 cases (24%). The average numbers of SLNs detected by ICG-FI, RI, and BD were 2.18, 1.76, and 1.73, respectively. Interestingly, ICG-FI not only detected more SLNs in one basin (ICG-FI: 1.64, RI: 1.50, and BD: 1.51 SLNs per basin), but also detected additional SLNs in other basins (ICG-FI: 1.32, RI: 1.18, and BD: 1.15 basins per case).
CONCLUSION: ICG-FI detected SLNs more efficiently than did the conventional methods, and these "occult" SLNs may offer an explanation for some false-negative cases. We recommend using ICG-FI in addition to a conventional method to reduce the risk of overlooking these "occult" SLNs.
METHODS: Thirty-four skin cancer patients received SLN biopsy with the following three methods: RI (99Tc-tin colloid), BD (2% patent blue), and ICG (0.5% indocyanine green). Lymph nodes detected by any of the three methods were counted as SLNs.
RESULTS: ICG-FI detected more SLNs in 8 out of the 34 cases (24%). The average numbers of SLNs detected by ICG-FI, RI, and BD were 2.18, 1.76, and 1.73, respectively. Interestingly, ICG-FI not only detected more SLNs in one basin (ICG-FI: 1.64, RI: 1.50, and BD: 1.51 SLNs per basin), but also detected additional SLNs in other basins (ICG-FI: 1.32, RI: 1.18, and BD: 1.15 basins per case).
CONCLUSION: ICG-FI detected SLNs more efficiently than did the conventional methods, and these "occult" SLNs may offer an explanation for some false-negative cases. We recommend using ICG-FI in addition to a conventional method to reduce the risk of overlooking these "occult" SLNs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedCarcinoma, Merkel CellCarcinoma, Squamous CellColoring AgentsFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleFluorescent DyesHumansIndocyanine GreenLymph NodesLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPaget Disease, ExtramammaryRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesRosaniline DyesSensitivity and SpecificitySentinel Lymph Node BiopsySkin NeoplasmsSweat Gland NeoplasmsTechnetium CompoundsTin Compounds