MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1227/00006123-198603000-00011

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 1986

Surgonomics: the cost dynamics of craniotomy.

Muñoz E, Byun H, Patel P, Laughlin A, Margolis I B, Wise L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Prospective payment systems using the diagnostic related group (DRG) mechanism are being phased in for Medicare inpatient hospital care. The purpose of this study was to examine a common neurosurgical procedure (001), craniotomy without trauma, and characterize the cost dynamics of this DRG. All patients (n = 50) treated in this DRG at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center during 1983 had their financial charges exclusive of physician fees examined. The findings were: (a) each hospital service category had wide charge variances around the mean; (b) emergency (ER) admissions were 200% more expensive than nonemergency (non-ER) admissions; (c) ER admissions seemed to have no greater severity of illness than non-ER admissions, but had a significantly different referral pattern (i.e., admission from the ER to a nonneurosurgical service with a subsequent neurosurgical referral); (d) this DRG when grouped into clinical "subproducts" (i.e., craniotomy for tumor, hematoma, hydrocephalus, aneurysm, benign cyst, and other) showed marked charge differences; and (e) the most expensive 25% of patients had five times higher charges than the least expensive 25% for both ER and non-ER admissions. This type of financial analysis may give surgeons a methodology with which to address the problems of cost containment in a more serious manner.

Для цитирования: Muñoz E, Byun H, Patel P, Laughlin A, Margolis I B, Wise L. Surgonomics: the cost dynamics of craniotomy.. Neurosurgery. 1986. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198603000-00011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.