Arab journal of nephrology and transplantation · 2012
Delayed graft function, allograft and patient srvival in kidney transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghadiani Mohammad Hassan, Peyrovi Said, Mousavinasab Seyed Nouraddin, Jalalzadeh Mojgan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Delayed Graft Function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplants and the long-term relation between DGF and survival of patients and grafts is not well established.
METHODS: This is a historical cohort study of transplanted patients in Taleghani Hospital of Shahid Beheshti University in Iran between 1994 and 2010. Patients who required dialysis during the first week after transplantation were considered to have DGF. The patients' conditions were updated to determine existing graft function, graft loss or patients' death at one year and five years post transplantation in relation to the presence or absence of DGF.
RESULTS: DGF complicated 67/385 transplants (17.4%). Causes included acute tubular necrosis (58.2%), accelerated rejection (29.9%), transplant renal artery thrombosis (9%) and renal vein thrombosis (3%). More kidneys in the DGF group were procured from cadaveric donors (6% versus 0.9%, P = 0.02). At hospital discharge, patients with DGF had significantly higher mean creatinine level (4.4 ± 2.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.7; P = 0.001) compared to other patients. They also had more early acute rejection episodes and more late acute rejection episodes (34.3% versus 2% and 16.4% versus 3%, respectively; P = 0.0001) compared to other patients. The proportion of functioning grafts was significantly lower in the DGF group at 1-year (53.7% versus 95.3%, P = 0.0001) and 5-years (22.4% versus 61.6%, P = 0.001) compared to patients without DGF.
CONCLUSION: The DGF group had a significantly higher acute rejection rate and an increased risk of graft loss at one and five years.
METHODS: This is a historical cohort study of transplanted patients in Taleghani Hospital of Shahid Beheshti University in Iran between 1994 and 2010. Patients who required dialysis during the first week after transplantation were considered to have DGF. The patients' conditions were updated to determine existing graft function, graft loss or patients' death at one year and five years post transplantation in relation to the presence or absence of DGF.
RESULTS: DGF complicated 67/385 transplants (17.4%). Causes included acute tubular necrosis (58.2%), accelerated rejection (29.9%), transplant renal artery thrombosis (9%) and renal vein thrombosis (3%). More kidneys in the DGF group were procured from cadaveric donors (6% versus 0.9%, P = 0.02). At hospital discharge, patients with DGF had significantly higher mean creatinine level (4.4 ± 2.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.7; P = 0.001) compared to other patients. They also had more early acute rejection episodes and more late acute rejection episodes (34.3% versus 2% and 16.4% versus 3%, respectively; P = 0.0001) compared to other patients. The proportion of functioning grafts was significantly lower in the DGF group at 1-year (53.7% versus 95.3%, P = 0.0001) and 5-years (22.4% versus 61.6%, P = 0.001) compared to patients without DGF.
CONCLUSION: The DGF group had a significantly higher acute rejection rate and an increased risk of graft loss at one and five years.