Journal of nephrology · 2012
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts contrast-induced nephropathy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Yong, Tan Ning, Zhou Ying-Ling, Chen Yu-Yi, Chen Ji-Yan, Chen Jin, Luo Jian-Fang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated hs-CRP as a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) for risk of CIN in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: We prospectively observed 165 consenting patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. An increase in serum creatinine of more than 0.5 mg/dL from baseline within 48-72 hours of contrast media exposure was defined as CIN. Demographics, traditional risk factors, CIN incidence and other in-hospital clinical outcomes were compared among hs-CRP quartiles. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to identify the optimal sensitivity for the observed range of hs-CRP. The predictive value of hs-CRP for the risk of CIN was assessed using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: CIN occurred in 17 patients (10%). Univariate analysis revealed CIN incidence was significantly associated with hs-CRP, with 2.4% for quartile Q1 (<6.00 mg/L), 2.3% for Q2 (6.00-13.90), 12.5% for Q3 (13.91-32.75) and 24.4% for Q4 (>32.75) (P-trend <0.001), as was in-hospital death (0% for Q1, 2.3% for Q2, 5% for Q3 and 12.2% for Q4; P-trend = 0.009). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that an hs-CRP of 16.10 mg/L was a fair discriminator for the early creatinine increase (C statistic 0.78). After adjusting for potential confounding predictors, hs-CRP >16.10 mg/L remained significantly associated with CIN (odds ratio = 6.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-33.61).
CONCLUSION: An hs-CRP >16.10 was a significant and independent predictor of CIN after primary PCI in patients with STEMI.
METHODS: We prospectively observed 165 consenting patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. An increase in serum creatinine of more than 0.5 mg/dL from baseline within 48-72 hours of contrast media exposure was defined as CIN. Demographics, traditional risk factors, CIN incidence and other in-hospital clinical outcomes were compared among hs-CRP quartiles. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to identify the optimal sensitivity for the observed range of hs-CRP. The predictive value of hs-CRP for the risk of CIN was assessed using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: CIN occurred in 17 patients (10%). Univariate analysis revealed CIN incidence was significantly associated with hs-CRP, with 2.4% for quartile Q1 (<6.00 mg/L), 2.3% for Q2 (6.00-13.90), 12.5% for Q3 (13.91-32.75) and 24.4% for Q4 (>32.75) (P-trend <0.001), as was in-hospital death (0% for Q1, 2.3% for Q2, 5% for Q3 and 12.2% for Q4; P-trend = 0.009). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that an hs-CRP of 16.10 mg/L was a fair discriminator for the early creatinine increase (C statistic 0.78). After adjusting for potential confounding predictors, hs-CRP >16.10 mg/L remained significantly associated with CIN (odds ratio = 6.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-33.61).
CONCLUSION: An hs-CRP >16.10 was a significant and independent predictor of CIN after primary PCI in patients with STEMI.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinChi-Square DistributionChinaContrast MediaCreatinineFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceKidney DiseasesLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesROC CurveRadiographyRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsTreatment Outcome