MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/1119-3077.158946

Медицинская библиотека · Nigerian journal of clinical practice · 2015

Biomechanical comparison of osteosynthesis with poly-L-lactic acid and titanium screw in intracapsular condylar fracture fixation: An experimental study.

Omezli M M, Torul D, Polat M E, Dayi E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of poly-L-lactic acid and titanium screws in the fixation of intracapsular condylar fractures, in 10 polyurethane hemimandibles.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Artificial intracapsular fractures were created with a steel disk and electronic micromotor. The first group was fixed with 15 mm long self-tapping 2.0 mm system titanium screws and the second group was fixed with 15 mm long 2.4 mm bioresorbable screws. Linear loads of 25, 50, 75, 100 N was applied in anteroposterior direction to the hemimandibles and the data were transmitted directly from the load cell to a computer that shows emergent results of material characteristics under same forces as a graphic containing force and displacement.

RESULTS

The results show that there were no significant differences between the two methods, with 25 N of loading. (P > 0,05) The difference became significant with a higher value of loading.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that treatment with a single resorbable screw is not functionally stable as a single titanium screw.

Для цитирования: Omezli M M, Torul D, Polat M E, Dayi E. Biomechanical comparison of osteosynthesis with poly-L-lactic acid and titanium screw in intracapsular condylar fracture fixation: An experimental study.. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2015. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.158946.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.