MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0100-69912014000200002

Медицинская библиотека · Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2014

Surgical treatment of subcostal incisional hernia with polypropylene mesh - analysis of late results.

Peres Marco Antonio de Oliveira, Aguiar Herberti Rosique, Andreollo Nelson Adami

Clinical StudyСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of subcostal incisional hernia repair using polypropylene mesh, the technical aspects of musculo-aponeurotic reconstruction, routine fixation of supra-aponeurotic mesh and follow-up for five years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that assessed 24 patients undergoing subcostal incisional hernia repair with use of polypropylene mesh; 15 patients (62.5%) were female; ages ranged from 33 to 82, and 79.1% had comorbidities.

RESULTS

Early complications: three cases (12.5%) of wound infection, three cases (12.5%) of seroma, one case (4.1%) of hematoma; and one case (4.1%) of wound dehiscence. Late complications occurred in one case (4.1%) of hernia recurrence attributed to technical failure in the fixation of the mesh and in one case (4.1%) of chronic pain. There were no cases of exposure or rejection of the mesh.

CONCLUSION

The subcostal incisional hernia, though not very relevant, requires adequate surgical treatment. Its surgical correction involves rebuilding the muscle-aponeurotic defect, supra-aponeurotic fixation of polypropylene mesh, with less complexity and lower rates of complications and recurrences.

Для цитирования: Peres Marco Antonio de Oliveira, Aguiar Herberti Rosique, Andreollo Nelson Adami. Surgical treatment of subcostal incisional hernia with polypropylene mesh - analysis of late results.. Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes. 2014. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69912014000200002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.