Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2005
Comparison of serum tryptase and urine N-methylhistamine in patients with suspected mastocytosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Toorenenbergen A W, Oranje A P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The disease extent of mastocytosis can be assessed by measurement of mediators or their metabolites, secreted from mast cells. In the present study, we compared results of urinary N-methylhistamine measurements with analysis of total tryptase in serum from patients with suspected mastocytosis.
METHODS: Tryptase in serum was determined with the UniCAP tryptase fluor-enzyme-immunoassay, according to the manufacturers' instructions (Pharmacia, Woerden, Netherlands). N-methylhistamine in urine was determined by competitive radioimmunoassay, according to the manufacturers' instructions (Pharmacia).
RESULTS: A significant correlation between serum tryptase and urine N-methylhistamine was found both for 138 patients aged 14 or older (Spearman Rank r(s)=0.43, p<0.0001) and for 23 younger patients (Spearman Rank r(s)=0.46, p=0.0267). The between-run coefficient of variation of the tryptase assay was half (6.7%) of the one (13%) found with the urinary N-methylhistamine assay. Both for urine N-methylhistamine and serum tryptase, a significant difference was found between corresponding biopsies with an increased number of mast cell aggregates and biopsies without such an increase. The difference between tryptase levels however was stronger (Mann-Whitney: p=0.0012) than the difference between N-methylhistamine levels (Mann-Whitney: p=0.0140).
CONCLUSION: Serum tryptase discriminates better than urinary N-methylhistamine between patients with an increased number of mast cell aggregates and persons without such an increase.
METHODS: Tryptase in serum was determined with the UniCAP tryptase fluor-enzyme-immunoassay, according to the manufacturers' instructions (Pharmacia, Woerden, Netherlands). N-methylhistamine in urine was determined by competitive radioimmunoassay, according to the manufacturers' instructions (Pharmacia).
RESULTS: A significant correlation between serum tryptase and urine N-methylhistamine was found both for 138 patients aged 14 or older (Spearman Rank r(s)=0.43, p<0.0001) and for 23 younger patients (Spearman Rank r(s)=0.46, p=0.0267). The between-run coefficient of variation of the tryptase assay was half (6.7%) of the one (13%) found with the urinary N-methylhistamine assay. Both for urine N-methylhistamine and serum tryptase, a significant difference was found between corresponding biopsies with an increased number of mast cell aggregates and biopsies without such an increase. The difference between tryptase levels however was stronger (Mann-Whitney: p=0.0012) than the difference between N-methylhistamine levels (Mann-Whitney: p=0.0140).
CONCLUSION: Serum tryptase discriminates better than urinary N-methylhistamine between patients with an increased number of mast cell aggregates and persons without such an increase.