MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/jns.1985.63.5.0745

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery · 1985

Behavior of an extradural pressure monitor in clinical use. Comparison of extradural with intraventricular pressure in patients with acute and chronically raised intracranial pressure.

Powell M P, Crockard H A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A comparison of intraventricular pressure (IVP) and extradural pressure (EDP) was carried out in 17 patients being investigated for normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and in six patients with acutely raised intracranial pressure following events such as head injury or intracerebral hematoma. Extradural pressure was measured using the CardioSearch monitor. There was a reasonably good correlation between EDP and IVP in the chronic stable group with pressures up to 25 mm Hg. In the acute group there was no predictable relationship between EDP and IVP, and during a 24-hour period the pressures could vary by as much as 30 mm Hg. Subdural pressure, measured with the same instruments, was compared to IVP in both acute and stable situations in eight other patients: there was a close and constant correlation between pressures in these two spaces. The authors conclude that misleading information may be obtained from EDP monitoring, and erroneous management decisions may result from dependence on such a technique. Possible explanations for this are discussed.

Для цитирования: Powell M P, Crockard H A. Behavior of an extradural pressure monitor in clinical use. Comparison of extradural with intraventricular pressure in patients with acute and chronically raised intracranial pressure.. Journal of neurosurgery. 1985. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.5.0745.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.