Diagnostic Accuracy of the Second Edition of the Paris System for Reporting High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma in Urinary Cytology.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Urinary cytology, a non-invasive screening tool, is essential for detecting high-grade urothelial neoplasms. The Paris System (TPS) standardizes reporting practices to improve diagnostic accuracy. TPS 2.0, introduced in 2022, categorizes samples into six diagnostic groups, emphasizing high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This retrospective study analyzed urine cytology samples from June 2023 to May 2024, correlating with histopathology when available. Samples were classified under TPS 2.0 categories, and statistical metrics including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for three groups based on malignancy criteria.
RESULTS
Out of 180 samples, the distribution was ND (3.9%), NHGUC (65.6%), AUC (10%), SHGUC (11.7%), and HGUC (8.9%). Histopathological correlation was available for 30.6% of cases. risk of malignancy values were: ND (33.3%), negative for HGUC (29.4%), AUC (66.7%), suspicious for HGUC (94.1%), and HGUC (100%). Group A showed the highest sensitivity (86.49%) and diagnostic accuracy (84.62%), while group C had 100% specificity and PPV.
CONCLUSION
The study confirms TPS 2.0's efficacy in improving diagnostic accuracy for HGUC, with high specificity and sensitivity. Compared to TPS 1.0, TPS 2.0 offers clearer diagnostic criteria, enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. The findings support the continued use of TPS 2.0 in clinical practice, ensuring reliable identification of HGUC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.