MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1708538114540144

Медицинская библиотека · Vascular · 2014

Practical application of bedside diagnostics in determining limb viability.

Dua Anahita, Desai Sapan S, Coogan Sheila

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the practical application of vascular lab studies in determining limb salvage outcomes in injured patients with concerning clinical examinations.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the trauma registry at a level I center was conducted from January 2009 to June 2013. All patients >16 years of age who sustained a lower limb arterial injury had a concerning clinical exam (mottled skin, decreased skin warmth, diminished pulses) and had vascular lab studies to determine management were included. Data-points included demographics, type and location of injury, procedure type, vascular lab study results, and limb outcome.

RESULTS

Over a five-year period, 11 trauma patients met inclusion criteria. Five of these patients had concerning clinical exams after revascularization, and six observed patients had a concerning clinical examination during the course of their hospitalization. All 11 patients had vascular lab studies that were within normal limits. As a result of normal vascular lab studies, none of these patients underwent further imaging or intervention. None of these patients underwent amputation.

CONCLUSION

Vascular lab studies may be utilized to determine the need for intervention and/or lower limb bypass sufficiency in patients with questionable clinical examinations post injury.

Для цитирования: Dua Anahita, Desai Sapan S, Coogan Sheila. Practical application of bedside diagnostics in determining limb viability.. Vascular. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1708538114540144.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.