Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2001
[Paget-von Schroetter syndrome as an occupational accident].
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zell L, Scheffler P, Heger M, Buchter A
Аннотация
HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: Two men and one woman developed typical symptoms of a thrombosis in the arms after unusual physical effort at their work place (a coal miner after a bad fall, a radiographer after having to catch a patient, a painter after jerkily moving a heavy piece of furniture).
INVESTIGATIONS AND DIAGNOSIS: In all three patients a thrombosis of the subclavian vein was demonstrated by duplex scans or phlebography. In two patients tests for hypercoagulability were unremarkable. None of the patients had a thoracic outlet syndrome.
TREATMENT AND COURSE: After initial local thrombolytic or heparin therapy alone, phenprocoumon treatment over several months was given in two cases, and in one case low-molecular-weight heparin was administered over several months. All three patients complained of strain-related residual symptoms in the affected arm (pain, swelling, easy fatigability). In all three cases, the accident insurer recognized the incident to be a work-related accident.
CONCLUSION: Patients with a Paget-Schroetter syndrome resulting from a sudden and unusual physical effort at work, which is covered by statutory accident insurance, must be reported to the accident insurer as a work-related accident in order to safeguard individual medical claims of the patient and for general medical and epidemiological reasons.
INVESTIGATIONS AND DIAGNOSIS: In all three patients a thrombosis of the subclavian vein was demonstrated by duplex scans or phlebography. In two patients tests for hypercoagulability were unremarkable. None of the patients had a thoracic outlet syndrome.
TREATMENT AND COURSE: After initial local thrombolytic or heparin therapy alone, phenprocoumon treatment over several months was given in two cases, and in one case low-molecular-weight heparin was administered over several months. All three patients complained of strain-related residual symptoms in the affected arm (pain, swelling, easy fatigability). In all three cases, the accident insurer recognized the incident to be a work-related accident.
CONCLUSION: Patients with a Paget-Schroetter syndrome resulting from a sudden and unusual physical effort at work, which is covered by statutory accident insurance, must be reported to the accident insurer as a work-related accident in order to safeguard individual medical claims of the patient and for general medical and epidemiological reasons.