MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12968/bjon.2024.33.4.168

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) · 2024

Women's experiences of assessment for urinary incontinence: a qualitative study.

Mjelde Lotte Miriam Eri, Litherland Anne Torine, Beisland Elisabeth Grov

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

One in four women experience urinary incontinence. A woman's medical history, a physical examination and certain tests can guide specialists in diagnosing and offering treatment. Despite the high prevalence, little is known about women's experience of urinary incontinence assessment.

AIM: To explore the experience of a group of women undergoing an assessment for urinary incontinence.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 women who had been assessed for urinary incontinence. A thematic reflective analysis method was used.

FINDINGS: The women experienced a lot of shame and worry related to their urinary incontinence and the assessment. Having a safe relationship with the urotherapist was very important, and being given information about treatment options gave hope for a better life.

CONCLUSION

Urinary incontinence and its assessment are associated with shame and anxiety. A good patient-urotherapist relationship is paramount and learning that treatments are available made women feel more optimistic about the future.

Для цитирования: Mjelde Lotte Miriam Eri, Litherland Anne Torine, Beisland Elisabeth Grov. Women's experiences of assessment for urinary incontinence: a qualitative study.. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing). 2024. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2024.33.4.168.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.