MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4172

Медицинская библиотека · European urology · 2025

Artificial Intelligence 3D Augmented Reality-guided Robotic Prostatectomy Versus Cognitive MRI Intervention: Results of the Prospective Randomized RIDERS Trial.

Porpiglia Francesco, Checcucci Enrico, Volpi Gabriele, Stura Ilaria, Cillis Sabrina De, Ortenzi Michele, Cisero Edoardo, Garzena Valentina, Gatti Cecilia, Liguori Saverio, Sica Michele, Alessio Paolo, Garino Davide, Tonelli Leonardo, Marchiò Caterina, Piramide Federico, Piana Alberto, Bollito Enrico, Piazzolla Pietro, De Luca Stefano, Migliaretti Giuseppe, Manfredi Matteo, Fiori Cristian, Amparore Daniele

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional (3D) augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have recently been introduced to enhance guidance during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). By overlaying virtual and real-time images, this approach helps accurately localize hidden lesions during surgery, enabling the execution of tailored procedures. This study aimed to evaluate whether 3D-AI-AR guidance reduces positive surgical margins (PSMs) compared with standard tw0-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based interventions.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT06318559), 133 patients with extracapsular extension or bulging at preoperative MRI were enrolled and randomized (2:1) to either 2D MRI-guided (n = 84) or 3D-AI-AR-guided RARP (n = 49). All the patients underwent nerve-sparing RARP. Intraoperative selective biopsies were then performed at the level of the preserved neurovascular bundle (NVB): cognitive in the MRI group and AR guided in the 3D group. The primary outcomes included PSM rate. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, continence, and potency recovery were assessed during the 12 mo of follow-up. The use of postoperative radiotherapy was recorded. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA >0.4 ng/ml. All the analyses were conducted with SAS Statistics Software v.9.4.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline and intraoperative characteristics were similar between the groups. While PSMs on prostate surface were comparable (p = 0.8), 3D-guided excisional biopsies had a significantly higher positivity rate (52% vs 13%; p = 0.001), allowing an improved margin control. The 3D group had a lower overall PSM rate (22% vs 39%; p = 0.047), required less postoperative RT (18% vs 35%; p = 0.046), and showed higher continence at 12 mo (91% vs 71%; p = 0.03). Potency and BCR rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The execution of a 3D-AI-AR-guided biopsy at the level of preserved NVBs during nerve-sparing RARP allows correct identification of the tumor with subsequent improvement of margin control. Longer follow-up is required to assess the functional and long-term oncological outcomes of this approach.

Для цитирования: Porpiglia Francesco, Checcucci Enrico, Volpi Gabriele, Stura Ilaria, Cillis Sabrina De, Ortenzi Michele, Cisero Edoardo, Garzena Valentina, Gatti Cecilia, Liguori Saverio, Sica Michele, Alessio Paolo, Garino Davide, Tonelli Leonardo, Marchiò Caterina, Piramide Federico, Piana Alberto, Bollito Enrico, Piazzolla Pietro, De Luca Stefano, Migliaretti Giuseppe, Manfredi Matteo, Fiori Cristian, Amparore Daniele. Artificial Intelligence 3D Augmented Reality-guided Robotic Prostatectomy Versus Cognitive MRI Intervention: Results of the Prospective Randomized RIDERS Trial.. European urology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4172.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.