MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.11.034

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of vascular surgery · 2016

Embolization of a Large Rapidly Growing Aortic Pseudo-Aneurysm Not Amenable to Open or Endovascular Repair.

Gemayel Gino, Mootoosamy Parmeseeven, Murith Nicolas, Kalangos Afksendiyos

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To report the case of a rapidly growing aortic false aneurysm because of Q fever infection that was managed by embolization.

CASE REPORT: An 80-year-old man was admitted to our unit for an aortic false aneurysm from a chronic Q fever infection. During his stay, the aneurysm showed rapid progression necessitating urgent treatment. The patient was unfit for surgical repair; moreover, the location of the aneurysm at the level of the superior mesenteric artery prohibited the use of an endovascular graft. He was managed by coiling of the aneurysmal cavity with multiple detachable coils after positioning of a bare aortic stent to lock the coils and prevent their migration into the aortic lumen. The false aneurysm was successfully thrombosed with no complications. The patient was then put on doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine to target Coxiella burnetii.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic false aneurysm coiling is feasible in cases where an endograft is not possible or an open repair is contraindicated. The use of a bare metal stent may help as a barrier to prevent the coils from migrating into the aneurysm and thus avoiding embolization into the systemic circulation.

Для цитирования: Gemayel Gino, Mootoosamy Parmeseeven, Murith Nicolas, Kalangos Afksendiyos. Embolization of a Large Rapidly Growing Aortic Pseudo-Aneurysm Not Amenable to Open or Endovascular Repair.. Annals of vascular surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.11.034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.