MedElevator
Войти в исследования Neurology India · 2021
Controversies in Hydrocephalus: QUO VADIS.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Udayakumaran Suhas, Pattisapu Jogi V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is a complex issue characterized by increased intracranial pressure secondary to obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid flow and occasionally due to overproduction. As a result, the entity has challenges of different dimensions at the level of understanding and management.
METHODS: A literature search, systematic review, and meta-analysis of eligible studies were conducted in the major databases. The literature review included relevant articles on hydrocephalus published until June 1, 2021 (no starting date), databases being the only limitation considering the broadness of the subthemes. Controversies themes were chosen among the literature, not including treatment dilemmas and hydrocephalus research. The further detailed search included these selected themes and an updated literature review on the subjects.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Controversies are a hallmark of incomplete science; most complex concepts harbor several debates at various levels. This article reviews controversies in hydrocephalus, offering some updates on popular discussions. It is not meant to be an exposition of the topics themselves but to collect the status quo of unresolved concepts in hydrocephalus.
CONCLUSIONS: As with most chronic and complex disorders, hydrocephalus welcomes controversy as a healthy discussion platform to exist until we understand the disorder to its minutest.
METHODS: A literature search, systematic review, and meta-analysis of eligible studies were conducted in the major databases. The literature review included relevant articles on hydrocephalus published until June 1, 2021 (no starting date), databases being the only limitation considering the broadness of the subthemes. Controversies themes were chosen among the literature, not including treatment dilemmas and hydrocephalus research. The further detailed search included these selected themes and an updated literature review on the subjects.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Controversies are a hallmark of incomplete science; most complex concepts harbor several debates at various levels. This article reviews controversies in hydrocephalus, offering some updates on popular discussions. It is not meant to be an exposition of the topics themselves but to collect the status quo of unresolved concepts in hydrocephalus.
CONCLUSIONS: As with most chronic and complex disorders, hydrocephalus welcomes controversy as a healthy discussion platform to exist until we understand the disorder to its minutest.