MedElevator
Войти в исследования Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2016
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hepatic Arterial Injury Related to Percutaneous Transhepatic Portal Intervention.
СтатьяTechnical ReportНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shimohira Masashi, Hashizume Takuya, Sasaki Shigeru, Ohta Kengo, Suzuki Kazushi, Nakagawa Motoo, Ozawa Yoshiyuki, Sakurai Keita, Nishikawa Hiroko, Hara Masaki, Shibamoto Yuta
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the hepatic arterial injury related to percutaneous transhepatic portal intervention (PTPI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients, 32 males and 22 females with a median age of 68 years (range 43-82 years), underwent PTPI. The procedures consisted of 33 percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolizations, 19 percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolizations, and 2 percutaneous transhepatic portal venous stent placements. Two patients with gastric varices underwent percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization twice because of recurrence. Therefore, the total number of procedures was 56. Among them, hepatic arterial injury occurred in 6 PTPIs in 5 patients, and TAE was performed. We assessed technical success, complications related to TAE, and clinical outcome. Technical success was defined as the disappearance of findings due to hepatic arterial injury on digital subtraction angiography.
RESULTS: As hepatic arterial injuries, 4 extravasations and 2 arterioportal shunts developed. All TAEs were performed successfully. The technical success rate was 100 %. Complication of TAE occurred in 5 of 6 TAEs; 3 were focal liver infarction, not requiring further treatment, and 2 were biloma that required percutaneous drainage. Five TAEs in 4 patients were performed immediately after the PTPI, and these 4 patients were alive. However, one TAE was performed 10 h later, and the patient died due to multiple organ failure 2 months later although TAE was successful.
CONCLUSION: TAE is a useful treatment for hepatic arterial injury related to PTPI. However, it should be performed at an early stage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients, 32 males and 22 females with a median age of 68 years (range 43-82 years), underwent PTPI. The procedures consisted of 33 percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolizations, 19 percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolizations, and 2 percutaneous transhepatic portal venous stent placements. Two patients with gastric varices underwent percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization twice because of recurrence. Therefore, the total number of procedures was 56. Among them, hepatic arterial injury occurred in 6 PTPIs in 5 patients, and TAE was performed. We assessed technical success, complications related to TAE, and clinical outcome. Technical success was defined as the disappearance of findings due to hepatic arterial injury on digital subtraction angiography.
RESULTS: As hepatic arterial injuries, 4 extravasations and 2 arterioportal shunts developed. All TAEs were performed successfully. The technical success rate was 100 %. Complication of TAE occurred in 5 of 6 TAEs; 3 were focal liver infarction, not requiring further treatment, and 2 were biloma that required percutaneous drainage. Five TAEs in 4 patients were performed immediately after the PTPI, and these 4 patients were alive. However, one TAE was performed 10 h later, and the patient died due to multiple organ failure 2 months later although TAE was successful.
CONCLUSION: TAE is a useful treatment for hepatic arterial injury related to PTPI. However, it should be performed at an early stage.