MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1098/rspb.2021.2260

Медицинская библиотека · Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021

Evidence for a vocal signature in the rat and its reinforcing effects: a key role for the subthalamic nucleus.

Vielle Cassandre, Montanari Christian, Pelloux Yann, Baunez Christelle

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although rodents have a well-structured vocal form of communication, like humans and non-human primates, there is, to date, no evidence for a vocal signature in the well-known 50- and 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) emitted by rats. Here, we show that rats can recognize the identity of the USV emitter since they choose to preferentially self-administer playback of 50-kHz USVs emitted by a stranger rat over those of their cagemate. In a second experiment, we show that only stranger, but not familiar, 50-kHz USVs reduce cocaine self-administration. Finally, to study the neurobiological substrate of these processes, we have shown that subthalamic nucleus (STN)-lesioned rats did not lever press much for any USV playback, whatever their emotional valence, nor did they seem able to differentiate familiar from stranger peer. Advocating for the existence of a vocal signature in rats, these results highlight the importance of ultrasonic communication in the socio-affective influence of behaviour, such as the influence of proximal social factors on drug consumption and confirm the role of the STN on this influence.

Для цитирования: Vielle Cassandre, Montanari Christian, Pelloux Yann, Baunez Christelle. Evidence for a vocal signature in the rat and its reinforcing effects: a key role for the subthalamic nucleus.. Proceedings. Biological sciences. 2021. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2260.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.