MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke · 2005

[Experiences with a special vulvar clinic in Oslo].

Edgardh Karin

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Women with longstanding vulvar problems have difficulties finding medical care. In 2000, a first Norwegian vulvar clinic was opened at the Olafia centre for venereology in Oslo. The initiative was continued in 2003 by a multi-professional team in the dept. of gynaecology and obstetrics at Rikshospitalet University Hospital.

METHODS

Medical records from the two Vulva clinics have been reviewed in retrospect.

RESULTS

During the period 2000 to 2003, a total of 217 patients had 470 visits to the Olafia clinic, mean age 31.4 years. Vulvodynia was diagnosed in 52% of all patients, 30% had a genital infection, 22% a genital dermatitis or dermatosis and 21% a primary sexual problem. At the multi-professional Rikshospitalet vulva clinic, run by specialists in gynaecology and dermato-venereology, 141 patients had 206 visits in 2003, mean age 42.5 years. Vulvodynia was diagnosed in 38%, 26% had a genital skin condition, 11% primary sexual problems, 10% a genital infection, and 10% a gynaecological problem. A few patients were healthy controls. The difference in diagnostic groups is related to the age of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The options for vulvar patients have improved in Oslo. Multi-professional cooperation has been achieved in our department, which serves as a national referral centre.

Для цитирования: Edgardh Karin. [Experiences with a special vulvar clinic in Oslo].. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.