MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/nmo.14931

Медицинская библиотека · Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024

Comparison of measurement of integrated relaxation pressure by esophageal manometry with analysis of swallowing sounds with artificial intelligence in patients with achalasia.

Lankarani Kamran B, Aboulpor Nahid, Boostani Reza, Saeian Samira

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorders are mainly evaluated with high-resolution manometry (HRM) which is a time-consuming and uncomfortable procedure with potential adverse events. Acoustic characterization of the swallowing has the potential to be an alternative noninvasive procedure.

METHODS

We compared the findings on HRM and swallowing sounds in 43 patients who were referred for evaluation of dysphagia. The sound analysis was done with empirical mode decomposition method and with artificial intelligence (AI) and the estimated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) from a two-layer neural network method was compared to measured IRP on HRM. The model then was tested in five patients.

KEY

RESULTS

IRP was estimated with high accuracy using the model developed with two-layer neural network method.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The analysis of acoustic properties of swallowing has the potential to be used for evaluation of esophageal motility disorders, this needs to be further evaluated in larger studies.

Для цитирования: Lankarani Kamran B, Aboulpor Nahid, Boostani Reza, Saeian Samira. Comparison of measurement of integrated relaxation pressure by esophageal manometry with analysis of swallowing sounds with artificial intelligence in patients with achalasia.. Neurogastroenterology and motility. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14931.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.